Anti-universalist interpretations of 1 Corinthians 3:10-15
Anti-universalist
interpretations of 1 Corinthians 3:10-15
The scholar
Mark Chenoweth has an interesting section about how some Church Fathers interpreted
1 Corinthians 3:10-15 (verse 3:15 in particular)[1] in
a seemingly universalist way[2] to show that David Bentley Hart’s
universalist interpretation of the passage has precedents. Chenoweth quotes Fr.
Lawrence Farley as saying: “it is clear that in this passage that Paul is not
talking about the fate of all men, but solely about the fate of those Christian
teachers in Corinth”. Considering that Hart, Chenoweth and Farley are, if I
recall correctly, Eastern Orthodox one might find surprising that some thinkers
venerated in the Eastern Orthodox traditions actually saw that passage as indicating
a fate of ultimate perdition, as I shall below. At the same time,
though, among the Latin Fathers 1 Corinthians 3:10-15 as been a main inspiration
for the teaching of Purgatory as a temporary state of punishments of the
imperfect elects[3].
Interpretation 1: 1 Corinthians 3:15 as
describing temporary punishments for some of the saved
As I said,
the first anti-universalist interpretation of 1 Corinthians 3:15 is that it
refers to the possible fate of some of the faithful who need, however, to
experience some temporal punishment before entering Heaven. As we will see,
however, there are some differences in the exegeses of the authors I’ll quote
as providing this kind of interpretation. I’ll quote the opinion of three
different Latin theologians venerated as saints both in the Roman Catholic
Chuch and the Eastern Orthodox Church.
St.
Augustine of Hippo (d. 430) wrote:
“68. But, since these fully plain and most
pertinent apostolic testimonies cannot be false, that one obscure saying about
those who build on "the foundation, which is Christ, not gold, silver, and
precious stones, but wood, hay, and stubble"148 --for it is about these it is
said that they will be saved as by fire, not perishing on account of the saving
worth of their foundation--such a statement must be interpreted so that it does
not contradict these fully plain testimonies.
In fact, wood and hay and stubble may be
understood, without absurdity, to signify such an attachment to those worldly
things--albeit legitimate in themselves--that one cannot suffer their loss
without anguish in the soul. Now, when such anguish "burns," and
Christ still holds his place as foundation in the heart--that is, if nothing is
preferred to him and if the man whose anguish "burns" would still
prefer to suffer loss of the things he greatly loves than to lose Christ--then
one is saved, "by fire." But if, in time of testing, he should prefer
to hold onto these temporal and worldly goods rather than to Christ, he does
not have him as foundation--because he has put "things" in the first
place--whereas in a building nothing comes before the foundations.
Now, this fire, of which the apostle speaks,
should be understood as one through which both kinds of men must pass: that is,
the man who builds with gold, silver, and precious stones on this foundation
and also the man who builds with wood, hay, and stubble. For, when he had
spoken of this, he added: "The fire shall try every man's work, of what
sort it is. If any man's work abides which he has built thereupon, he shall
receive a reward. If any man's work burns up, he shall suffer loss; but he himself
shall be saved, yet so as by fire."149 Therefore the fire will test
the work, not only of the one, but of both.
The fire is a sort of trial of affliction,
concerning which it is clearly written elsewhere: "The furnace tries the
potter's vessels and the trial of affliction tests righteous men."150 This kind of fire works in the
span of this life, just as the apostle said, as it affects the two different
kinds of faithful men. There is, for example, the man who "thinks of the
things of God, how he may please God." Such a man builds on Christ the
foundation, with gold, silver, and precious stones. The other man "thinks
about the things of the world, how he may please his wife"151 ; that is, he builds upon the
same foundation with wood, hay, and stubble. The work of the former is not
burned up, since he has not loved those things whose loss brings anguish. But
the work of the latter is burned up, since things are not lost without anguish
when they have been loved with a possessive love. But because, in this second
situation, he prefers to suffer the loss of these things rather than losing
Christ, and does not desert Christ from fear of losing such things--even though
he may grieve over his loss--"he is saved," indeed, "yet so as
by fire." He "burns" with grief, for the things he has loved and
lost, but this does not subvert nor consume him, secured as he is by the
stability and the indestructibility of his foundation.
69. It is not incredible that something like
this should occur after this life, whether or not it is a matter for fruitful
inquiry. It may be discovered or remain hidden whether some of the faithful are
sooner or later to be saved by a sort of purgatorial fire, in proportion as
they have loved the goods that perish, and in proportion to their attachment to
them. However, this does not apply to those of whom it was said, "They
shall not possess the Kingdom of God,"152 unless their crimes are
remitted through due repentance. I say "due repentance" to signify
that they must not be barren of almsgiving, on which divine Scripture lays so
much stress that our Lord tells us in advance that, on the bare basis of
fruitfulness in alms, he will impute merit to those on his right hand; and, on
the same basis of unfruitfulness, demerit to those on his left--when he shall
say to the former, "Come, blessed of my Father, receive the Kingdom,"
but to the latter, "Depart into everlasting fire."153 (St. Augustine of Hippo,
Enchiridion 68-9; source: https://www.tertullian.org/fathers/augustine_enchiridion_02_trans.htm )
Ambrosiaster,
an author of the 4th century whose works have been often attributed
to St. Ambrose, commented on 1 Corinthians 3:15 in this way:
“ ‘If someone's work burns, they will
suffer loss’. The work that is said to burn is bad doctrine, which will perish.
For all evil things will perish, like the path of the wicked; because they are
not substances, but perverse assertions. However, to suffer loss is to endure
punishment. For who, when placed in punishment, does not incur loss?
‘But he himself will be saved, yet as if through fire’. He said he will be
saved, because the substance on which it is based will not be destroyed, just
as bad teaching will be destroyed, because it is an accidental cause.
Therefore, he said: ‘yet as if through fire’; so that this salvation is not
without punishment, because he did not say: ‘he will be saved through fire’; so
that, not being consumed by fire through his own merit, he may be saved, but
when he says: ‘yet as if through fire’, he shows that he will indeed be saved,
but will suffer the punishments of fire; so that, purified by fire, he may be
saved, and not be tormented eternally like the unfaithful in the eternal fire:
so that to some extent it is worth believing in Christ. For it is always
necessary that one who sees himself defend the false as true should be ashamed;
and in a similar way, one who has cast off falsehood and followed the truth
will always have confidence in God; and one who has rejected impiety has
submitted to piety. For whatever is outside the Catholic Church is contrary.” (Ambrosiaster,
Commentary on 1 Corinthians 3:15; translated via ChatGPT; source: https://historicalchristian.faith/by_father.php?file=Ambrosiaster%2FCommentary%2520on%25201%2520Corinthians.html
)
St. Gregory
the Great[4]
(d. 604) similarly writes:
“GREGORY. Our Lord saith in the Gospel: Walk
whiles you have the light:61 and by his Prophet he saith: In time
accepted have I heard thee, and in the day of salvation have I holpen thee:62 which the Apostle St. Paul expounding,
saith: Behold, now is the time acceptable; behold, now the
day of salvation.63 Solomon, likewise, saith: Whatsoever
thy hand is able to do, work it instantly: for neither work, nor reason, nor
knowledge, nor wisdom shall be in hell, whither thou dost hasten.64 David also saith: Because his mercy is
for ever.65 By which sayings it is plain, that in such
state as a man departeth out of this life, in the same he is presented in
judgment before God. But yet we must believe that before the day of judgment
there is a Purgatory fire for certain small sins: because our Saviour
saith, that he which speaketh blasphemy against the holy Ghost, that it
shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, nor in the world to come.66 Out of which sentence we learn, that some sins
are forgiven in this world, and some other may be pardoned in the next: for
that which is denied concerning one sin, is consequently understood to be
granted touching some other. But yet this, as I said, we have not to believe
but only concerning little and very small sins, as, for example, daily idle
talk, immoderate laughter, negligence in the care of our family (which kind of
offences scarce can they avoid, that know in what sort sin is to be shunned), ignorant
errors in matters of no great weight: all which sins be punished after death,
if men procured not pardon and remission for them in their lifetime: for when
St. Paul saith, that Christ is the foundation: and by and by
addeth: And if any man build upon this foundation gold, silver,
precious stones, wood, hay, stubble: the work of every one, of what kind it is,
the fire shall try. If any man's work abide which he built thereupon, he shall
receive reward; if any mans work burn, he shall suffer detriment, but himself
shall be saved, yet so as by fire.67 For although these words may be
understood of the fire of tribulation, which men suffer in this world: yet if
any will interpret them of the fire of Purgatory, which shall be in the
next life: then must he carefully consider, that the Apostle said not that he
may be saved by fire, that buildeth upon this foundation iron, brass, or lead,
that is, the greater sort of sins, and therefore more hard, and consequently
not remissible in that place: but wood, hay, stubble, that is, little and very
light sins, which the fire doth easily consume. Yet we have here further to
consider, that none can be there purged, no, not for the least sins that be,
unless in his lifetime he deserved by virtuous works to find such favour in
that place.” (St. Pope Gregory the Great, Dialogues, chapter 39; source: https://historicalchristian.faith/by_father.php?file=Gregory%2520the%2520Dialogist%2FDialogues%2FBook%25204.html )
Notice that
like Augustine, Gregory thinks that the passage can be applied even to this
life. And, also, it should be noted that Ambrosiaster thought that the images
of ‘wood, hay and stubble’ were used because falsehoods are non-substantial and
not because they are ‘light sins’.
Interpretation 2: 1 Corinthians 3:15 refers to
eternal damnation
Perhaps
surprisingly, 1 Corinthians 3:15 has been interpreted as being about eternal
damnation. St John Chrysostom (d. 407), a Greek Church Father venerated by both
the Roman Catholic Church and by the Eastern Orthodox Church, in his homily 9
on 1 Corinthians wrote that:
“[1 Corinthians chapter 3, verse 12-15:] If
any man build upon this foundation gold, silver, costly stones, wood, hay,
stubble; each man's work shall be made manifest: for the day shall declare it,
because it is revealed in fire; and the fire shall prove each man's work of
what sort it is. If any man's work abide which he built thereon, he shall
receive a reward. If any man's work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss: but
he himself shall be saved; yet so as through fire.
This is no small subject of enquiry which we
propose, but rather about things which are of the first necessity and which all
men enquire about; namely, whether hell fire have any end. For that it hath no
end Christ indeed declared when he said, "Their fire shall not be
quenched, and their worm shall not die. [Mark chapter 8, verse 44 and Mark
chapter 8, verse 46 and Mark chapter 8, verse 48]
…
"If any man build upon this
foundation, gold, silver, costly stones, wood, hay, stubble." For after
the faith there is need of edification: and therefore he saith elsewhere,
"Edify one another with these words." (perhaps 1 Thessalonians
chapter 5, verse 11 and 1 Thessalonians chapter 4, verse 5) For both the
artificer and the learner contribute to the edifying. Wherefore he saith,
"But let every man take heed how he buildeth thereon." (1 Corinthians
chapter 3, verse 10) But if faith had been the subject of these sayings, the
thing affirmed is not reasonable. For in the faith all ought to be equal, since
"them is but one faith;" (Ephesians chapter 4, verse 5) but in
goodness of life it is not possible that all should be the same. Because the
faith is not in one case less, in another more excellent, but the same in all
those who truly believe. But in life there is room for some to be more
diligent, others more slothful; some stricter, and others more ordinary; that
some should have done well in greater things, others in less; that the errors
of some should have been more grievous, of others less notable. On this account
he saith, "Gold, silver, costly stones, wood, hay, stubble,-every man's
work shall be made manifest: "-his conduct; that is what he speaks of
here:-"If any man's work abide which he built thereupon, he shall receive
a reward; if any man's work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss."
Whereas, if the saying related to disciples and teachers, he ought not to
"suffer loss" for disciples refusing to hear. And therefore he saith,
"Every man shall receive his own reward according to his own labor"
not according to the result, but according to "the labor." For what
if the hearers gave no heed? Wherefore this passage also proves that the saying
is about actions.
Now his meaning is this: If any man have an ill
life with a right faith, his faith shall not shelter him from punishment, his
work being burnt up. The phrase, "shall be burned up," means,
"shall not endure the violence of the fire." But just as if a man
having golden armor on were to pass through a river of fire, he comes from
crossing it all the brighter; but if he were to pass through it with hay, so
far from profiling, he destroys himself besides; so also is the case in regard
of men's works. For he doth not say this as if he were discoursing of material
things being burnt up, but with a view of making their fear more intense, and
of shewing how naked of all defence he is who abides in wickedness. Wherefore
he said, "He shall suffer loss:" lo, here is one punishment:
"but he himself shall be saved, but so as by fire;" lo, again, here
is a second. And his meaning is, "He himself shall not perish in the same
way as his works, passing into nought, but he shall abide in the tire.
"He calleth it, however,
"Salvation," you will say; why, that is the cause of his adding,
"so as by fire:" since we also used to say, "It is preserved in
the fire," when we speak of those substances which do not immediately burn
up and become ashes. For do not at sound of the word fire imagine that those
who are burning pass into annihilation. And though he call such punishment
Salvation, be not astonished. For his custom is in things which have an ill
sound to use fair expressions, and in good things the contrary. For example,
the word "Captivity" seems to be the name of an evil thing, but Paul
has applied it in a good sense, when he says, "Bringing into captivity
every thought to the obedience of Christ."(2 Corinthians chapter 10, verse
5) And again, to an evil thing he hath applied a good word, saying, "Sin
reigned," (Romans chapter 5, verse 21) here surely the term
"reigning" is rather of auspicious sound. And so here in saying,
"he shall be saved," he hath but darkly hinted at the intensity of
the penalty: as if he had said, "But himself shall remain forever in
punishment."” (John Chrysostom, homily 9 on 1 Corinthians; source: https://historicalchristian.faith/by_father.php?file=John%2520Chrysostom%2FHomilies%2FOn%25201%2520Corinthians%2FHomily%25209.html
)
This is
clearly different from the interpretation of the authors quoted in the previous
section: according to Chrysostom, ‘salvation through fire’ actually means mere
ontological preservation (in a state of eternal damnation). Also, in contrast
to Gregory the Great, John Chrysostom makes no mention of the ‘lightness’ of
sins. A similar interpretation was given by another Greek theologian, revered
in the Eastern Orthodox Church, St. Theophylact of Ohrid (d. 1107), who clearly
followed Chrysostom:
“He himself will not perish in the same
way as his works, that is, he will not pass into nothingness, but will be
"saved," that is, preserved whole, so that he may burn in the fire.
Among us too, regarding wood that does not easily burn up and turn to ash, it
is customary to say that it remains whole in the fire, so that a considerable
amount of time is required for its burning. Thus the sinner suffers loss from
having labored over such works, from which he perishes, and expended all his
efforts on what has no being and does not exist (for every evil is
something non-existent), just as if someone were to purchase a corpse at a
great price instead of a living body. Meanwhile he himself, that is the sinner,
will be "saved," that is, preserved whole for eternal torments.” (Theophylact
of Ohrid, Commentary on 1 Corinthians 3:15; source: https://historicalchristian.faith/by_father.php?file=Theophylact%2520of%2520Ohrid%2FCommentary%2520on%25201%2520Corinthians%2FChapter%25203.html
)
It is
somewhat surprising to me that, being Eastern Orthodox, neither Chenoweth, nor
Farley, nor Hart seemed to have considered this interpretation (either approvingly
or disapprovingly) given that some theologians of the Eastern Orthodox Church
still follow Chrysostom in this[5].
[1] “10 According to the grace of God given to me, like a skilled master builder I laid a foundation, and another man is building upon it. Let each man take care how he builds upon it. 11 For no other foundation can any one lay than that which is laid, which is Jesus Christ. 12 Now if any one builds on the foundation with gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, straw— 13 each man’s work will become manifest; for the Day will disclose it, because it will be revealed with fire, and the fire will test what sort of work each one has done. 14 If the work which any man has built on the foundation survives, he will receive a reward. 15 If any man’s work is burned up, he will suffer loss, though he himself will be saved, but only as through fire.” (1 Corinthians 3:10-15, RSV translation; source: https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Corinthians%203%3A10-15&version=RSV)
[2] See the Section ‘The Early Church
Fathers and 1 Corinthians 3’ in this blog post: https://afkimel.wordpress.com/2021/02/02/the-deep-patristic-roots-of-harts-universalism-a-response-to-fr-lawrence-farley/
[3] And the official teaching of the
Catholic Church still accepts this: see paragraphs 1030-2 of the current Catechism
of the Catholic Church (link: https://www.catholiccrossreference.online/catechism/#!/search/1030-1032
) where 1 Corinthians 3:15 is explicitly cited in note 607 of paragraph 1031.
Also, in the encyclical ‘Spe Salvi’, Pope Benedict XVI (section 46) also quoted
the same passage in support for the doctrine of Purgatory (link: https://www.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_ben-xvi_enc_20071130_spe-salvi.html
).
[4] A nearly identical interpretation
to that of Gregory the Great was apparently advanced also by St. Caesarius of
Arles (d. 542), see: https://historicalchristian.faith/1corinthians/3/15
[5] See e.g. Fr. George Metallinos’ article ‘Paradise and
Hell According to Orthodox Tradition’, source: https://stjamesorthodox.org/paradiseandhell
Comments
Post a Comment